Free Speech Helps Dismantle And Debate Bad Ideas
The ideas and beliefs espoused by certain fringe elements in our society are controversial. Some of them are outright evil and terrifying.
These fringe groups can seem daunting. And make you feel as though it is unjust that they are allowed a platform to speak.
But there is a benefit with this element. With allowing them to speak, we can see their arguments. Their tactics. And their errors.
We can accurately point out and debate against these beliefs. In short, we can see them for what they really are. And prove that they are neither just nor rational.
Without freedom of speech, those theories would become boiling pots. Where anyone with a dissenting opinion could become radicalized because they couldnt find the intellectuals debating these belief structures. There would be no open discussion on them, so only the arguments would be in favor of them.
It would lead to a lot of radicalization, and not a lot we could do to stop it. Its much better to know your opponents case intensely. Which you can collect through open free speech discourse. That way, when you need to prove it incorrect, you have all the information, facts, and logical connections to make your case.
This can be done for any bad or controversial opinion. It doesnt have to be censored. Let free speech do its job in promoting only the best of ideas, and debunking the rest.
Are Nonverbal Symbols Such As Swastikas Or Burning Flags Constitutionally Protected
It depends. Symbols of hate are constitutionally protected if theyre worn or displayed before a general audience in a public place for example, in a march, at a rally in a public park or in designated free-speech areas . The Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment protects symbolic expression, such as swastikas, burning crosses and peace signs because such expression is closely akin to pure speech. The courts have held that burning the American flag is protected speech ), and so is wearing armbands to protest a war ), as these actions are considered symbolic expressions of disagreement with government policies.
However, the First Amendment does not protect the use of nonverbal symbols to directly threaten an individual or encroach upon or destroy private property. Examples might include burning a cross on private property or spray-painting swastikas on the library wall. In R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul , for example, the Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional a city ordinance that prohibited cross-burnings based solely on their symbolism. The courts decision makes clear, however, that the government may prosecute cross-burners under criminal trespass and/or antiharassment laws.
Freedom Of Speech Vs Hate Speech
One of the most widely discussed critiques of unlimited free speech is that it can condone and amplify hate speech. Hate speech can be defined as speech that is abusive and threatening towards a certain group of people, generally based on prejudices related to race, gender, sexuality, religion, or disability.
Some might ask, since people should be allowed to speak their minds and voice all opinions, why cant they simply express their dislike for certain things? This is an argument often uttered by those in favour of complete freedom of speech, including hate speech. However, people may disagree with this, arguing that a clearer line should be drawn between stating dislike and inciting violence. If nothing is off-limits, where does it end?
Recommended Reading: Most Important Language To Learn
What Do We Mean By Free Speech
We stand for the widest possible definition of freedom of speech: anything within the law.
English law restricts speech in some ways. It prohibits harassment, or incitement to hatred. But it does give people the right to say things which may shock or offend.
We want to make sure that students feel safe and are free to express themselves.
There is no place for violence, intimidation or criminality on university campuses. We also believe that censoring or marginalising some groups to protect others is not appropriate.
More Reasons Freedom Of Speech Is Important
Freedom of speech prime exchange of ideas: this is another excellent reason why freedom of speech is essential. People get to share a plan that will help them become better versions of themselves. When an idea is shared, it grows more significant than the norms because peoples mindset differs from another. Sharing thoughts will become easy.
Why freedom of speech is essential is also because it allows thought leaders can share their ideas because they are like the future of the community or even nation at large. Another good reason why freedom of speech is essential is that it exposes unlawful activities.
Without the freedom of speech, a lot of immoral and unlawful activities will be taking place and nobody to question or to air out whats going on in that office, organization, community, of home.
For the sake of freedom of speech before would want to do anything they will carefully watch before doing it and, in most cases, dont even do it because they know that with the freedom of speech, anybody can see them and report to the authority. They are hence tarnishing their image for them. Nobody likes to have their image displayed in a negative light.
Freedom of speech promotes societal growth. The most developed countries in the world are those countries that enable the freedom of speech earlier because amid the peoples information lies superior wisdom that can transform the society for better and then attract global recognition and foreign exchange.
Also Check: My Name In Different Languages
Why Does The Bill Of Rights Protect Speech
A man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them, James Madison wrote in 1792. To Madison, people not only owned their thoughts, but owned the right to express them as well. This rightso important to the principles of liberty and self-governmentis protected in the Bill of Rights because the British had long censored political debate. The Founders knew how powerful speech could be.
Madison dreamed of a society in which citizens vigorously and fully participate in discussions about politics. Such discussion does more than promote self-government through participation. If not for free and open speech, people who are not allowed to voice their opinions or protest might resort to violence. For this reason, free speech and political discussion help resolve conflicts. Free speech also helps create an energetic and creative society, and can act as a check on the power of government, since citizens are free to criticize it. Madison thought that everyone should be guaranteed the right to free speech, no matter how unpopular ones views may be.
Freedom Of Speech Stops Negativity
The right to freedom of expression does not permit citizens to speak negatively about other people without giving them the chance first to explain their perspective on the issue at hand.
This also includes insulting or cursing at another person because that would be considered an abuse of ones rights and freedoms whereas, for ones rights and freedoms to be in place in a society, there must also be respect for other people.
Don’t Miss: Does United Healthcare Cover Speech Therapy
What Are First Amendment Rights In The Us
Youve probably heard people refer to their first amendment rights in America, since freedom of speech is often considered a fundamental part of being an American. This law guarantees freedoms related to religion, expression, assembly and petitioning, and allows individuals to assemble and speak freely. The amendment actually states:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The study we discussed earlier by Pew Research Centre demonstrated just how much Americans care about their first amendment rights. They found that Americans were some of the most supportive citizens of free speech, freedom of the press, and the right to use the internet without government censorship. In addition, they discovered that Americans were more tolerant of offensive language than other nationalities.
However, it is interesting to consider that the U.S. is ranked at 44 out of 180 countries when ranked in the 2021 World Press Freedom Index.
Case Study: Poland And The Right To Protest
Amnesty International has documented how people in Poland have taken to the streets to express their opinions despite restrictive legislation combined with heavy-handed policing, surveillance, harassment and prosecution which threaten to strangle the right to peaceful protest.
Since 2016, tens of thousands of people have protested against repressive legislation aimed at curbing womens rights and undermining the independence of the judiciary. Protesters have routinely been met with a show of force and restrictive measures that infringe their right to be seen and heard. Hundreds have found themselves in police custody and facing lengthy court proceedings.
In parallel with tightening the laws affecting the exercise of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly, the government has vastly expanded the surveillance powers of law enforcement agencies with evidence that these expanded powers have been used against people engaged in organizing and participating in peaceful protests.
Recommended Reading: What Is The Language Of Switzerland
Attacks On Journalists Csos And Whistleblowers
Politicians and powerful figures who fear journalists will expose their corrupt behaviour resort to dirty, extra-legal tactics to silence them. Common strategies include legal harassment through SLAPPs or smear campaigns aimed at discrediting critical CSOs.
Whistleblowers have faced devastating personal consequences for shedding light on activities against the publics interest such as corruption, illegal activities or malpractice.
Journalists and civil rights defenders are also increasingly in danger of verbal or physical violence, including by police.
Is The Internet A Public Forum
One of the reasons its so difficult to police the internet is because its a kind of public forum. As described by professors at the University of Bristol in our open step about free speech and the internet, the internet provides a platform for those otherwise denied a voice.
Rather than just media companies and journalists being the information providers, we are offered perspectives from ordinary citizens. This can be incredibly powerful in certain instances, such as when people are experiencing abuses of power by their government, police, or authorities. The power of storytelling online cannot be underestimated.
However, the internet also encourages the free sharing of information and opinions in more ordinary circumstances take Wikipedia, for example, which is written, edited and checked by anyone who wants to contribute. This is an example of moderation being carried out by ordinary people instead of the state. The same can be said for forums such as Reddit.
Read Also: Sertoma Speech And Hearing Center
Does The First Amendment Protect All Speech
While the First Amendment provides broad protections of speech, it does not protect all types of speech. The Supreme Court has worked to make clear the meaning of the freedom of speechand its boundariesover the past century.
In Brandenburg v. Ohio , the Supreme Court drew one such boundary of First Amendment protection. In this case Brandenburg, a Ku Klux Klan leader, was seen on film giving a speech that the State of Ohio claimed violated its law against advocating violence. In his speech, he mentioned what he called revengeance, but ultimately he called for a July 4th march in the nations capital. The Supreme Court ruled that Brandenburgs speech was protected by the First Amendment, but in doing so created a limit on free speech. While Brandenburg might have encouraged unlawful action, he did not encourage imminent lawless action, or immediate illegal behavior. If he had, his speech would not, the Court ruled, have been protected speech.
Relationship To Other Rights
The right to freedom of speech and expression is closely related to other rights. It may be limited when conflicting with other rights . The right to freedom of expression is also related to the right to a fair trial and court proceeding which may limit access to the search for information, or determine the opportunity and means in which freedom of expression is manifested within court proceedings. As a general principle freedom of expression may not limit the right to privacy, as well as the honor and reputation of others. However, greater latitude is given when criticism of public figures is involved.
The right to freedom of expression is particularly important for media, which plays a special role as the bearer of the general right to freedom of expression for all. However, freedom of the press does not necessarily enable freedom of speech. Judith Lichtenberg has outlined conditions in which freedom of the press may constrain freedom of speech. For example, if all the people who control the various mediums of publication suppress information or stifle the diversity of voices inherent in freedom of speech. This limitation was famously summarised as “Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one”. Lichtenberg argues that freedom of the press is simply a form of property right summed up by the principle “no money, no voice”.
You May Like: Origins Of The Portuguese Language
The Freedom To Express An Opinion Without Fear Of Being Prosecuted Is An Important Cornerstone Of A Free Society However This Right Has A Long History Of Suppression
Throughout history, individuals have often been punished for criticizing their rulers, or sharing ideas that challenged the establishment of their time.
In countries where citizens have suffered under the rule of more authoritarian regimes these liberties take much longer to materialize. Sadly, there are also countries in which the right to voice dissenting opinions is yet to become a reality, as under certain authoritarian regimes, those who criticize government policy are punished severely.
In recent years, there has been a worrying shift in favor of both increased government censorship and indeed a culture of censorship, even in countries which have historically proclaimed the virtues of free speech.
Free Speech Encourages The Search For Truth
When a person speaks freely they can express their views or opinions on any issue. In this way, this brings up other ideas and thoughts which leads people to look further into many issues.
Whether it be social, political, or any other.
This study makes them learn about others perspectives of an issue that they did not know before which broadens their mind.
You May Like: Text To Speech Characters Voices
I Want To Hold An Event On Nc States Campus Whom Should I Contact
You should contact the responsible administrator to request the use of the space. A list of spaces that can be reserved and the administrator responsible for each space can be found on the Student Centers Events and Student Involvement websites. Requests to reserve space must be submitted electronically to the responsible administrator. Please review the regulation governing Use of University Space for more information.
Note: Groups and individuals not affiliated with the university must be sponsored by a university group, student group or student in order to use space on NC States campus. A fee may be charged for the use of university space and any related security costs.
Why Is Freedom Of Speech Important
There are so many reasons why freedom of speech is important. Of course, the biggest reason is that freedom is paramount in a democracy. If we cannot speak freely, it often means that our liberties are being restricted in some way. However, its a little more complicated than that, so we took a look at our open step about freedom of expression by Humanists UK.
One thing thats highlighted in our open step is that all humans make mistakes, and somehow we learn to correct them. The way that we enrich or change our beliefs and opinions is through listening to contradictory arguments. Critical discussion is a fundamental part of the human learning experience, and critical discussions would not exist without people being able to express opposing beliefs.
In this way, disagreements can be extremely productive. Also, Humanists UK point out that causing offence is not always a bad thing. Many ideas from history caused offence at the time, but now they are considered important and revolutionary take Mary Wollstonecraft and Charles Darwin, for example.
You May Like: Easy Topic For Persuasive Speech
Three Reasons Free Speech Matters
Friday, November 7, 2014
The following is the prepared version of Professor Steven Pinkers remarks at the 15th Anniversary Dinner for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, delivered in New York, in October.
A few years ago I wrote a chapter on taboo language which began, Its no coincidence that freedom of speech is enshrined in the first of the ten amendments to the Constitution that make up the Bill of Rights, because freedom of speech is the foundation of democracy.
It didnt take long for a historian to write to me, saying, Actually, it is a coincidence. Originally, the framers had framed twelve amendments, of which the one guaranteeing free speech was third. The first two, which dealt with how congressmen were paid and other housekeeping issues, failed to pass, resulting in the third amendment being promoted to first.
It serves me right for assuming that history provides us with neat symbolism that makes for cute chapter openings. Still, I could have written, Its fitting that the constitutional guarantee of free speech is the first of the ten amendments, because free speech is indeed the foundation of democracy and, as I hope to remind you this evening, much else that is worthwhile in life.
Portions of this address were adapted from Pinker’s New Republic essays Science is not Your Enemy and The Trouble with Harvard .